The driver’s reaction is a set of skills that allow you to timely prevent an emergency and apply the brake.

Driving a car requires special attention from drivers. They must respond in time to all kinds of obstacles, be able to predict emergencies. Sometimes there are only a few seconds to apply the brake, and those seconds can cost someone their life.

What determines the reaction rate

Many factors affect response time. It is not only the brand of the car, the weather conditions on the street that matters, but also the individual characteristics of the organism.

What is the average driver’s reaction time and what does it depend on:

• The gender of the person. It is scientifically proven that men react to potential danger faster than women. Their reaction time is on average at 1,8 s. While for ladies, the speed of reaction to danger is 2,8 s.
• Age. Motorists under the age of thirty react faster to impending danger. Young drivers react to a potential accident in 1,54 seconds. The reaction time in the elderly increases to 2,05 s.
• Driving experience. People who have driven a vehicle for more than 5 years can react faster to impending danger than those who have recently driven.

Additional factors:

• time of day at which movement is carrying out;
• weather;
• the speed at which the car is moving;
• the quality of the road surface;
• the level of illumination of the road at night;
• the general well-being of the driver while driving.

Also, the speed of response to probable accidents depends on the physical fitness of the person driving.

What happens when you drink alcohol?

To find out how alcohol affects the driver’s reaction, it is necessary to understand the mechanism of the effect of alcohol on the human body as a whole.

Alcoholic drinks are basing on ethanol. They have a calming and inhibitory effect. Therefore, a drunk driver is a potential killer. Such people can harm not only themselves but also other motorists who drive without breaking the rules.

When drinking alcohol, the speed of reaction to a potential danger decreases, the criticality of assessing a difficult transport situation is distorting. All this leads to road traffic accidents, which can turn into dire consequences.

Also, alcohol itself negatively affects the work of the heart, brain, blood vessels.

Drinking and driving: understanding the risks

It is strictly forbidden to drive while drunk, even if you have drinking very little.

How alcohol affects the driver’s reaction time:

1. Small doses of alcohol also negatively affect the nervous system, as a result – the reaction is inhibiting.
2. Ethanol enters the brain, which leads to a deterioration in the activity of the nervous system. An untrained driver may face attacks of headaches, increased pressure, chest discomfort while driving, which is likely to provoke an accident.

How alcohol influences driver reaction time

When drunk, the ability to quickly respond to danger and make timely decisions in difficult situations on the road is lost.

At the same time, many drivers, having drunk alcohol, overestimate their abilities and believe that they can prevent an accident, almost completely losing their vigilance.

In fact, it turns out that their reaction is slow, although the motorists themselves do not think so at the time of movement.

Experts believe that a drunk person is much more dangerous than an elderly or sick person. After all, older people control their actions, are in a sane state, and do not overestimate their abilities. Rather, on the contrary, they have excessive vigilance.

But alcohol and a quick reaction to a difficult road situation are practically incompatible things.

Often, drunk drivers want to throw out their energy and feel the excitement due to a surge of adrenaline:

• they begin to drive at high-speed
• drunk drivers try to repeat any tricks that they would never do in a sober mind
• they try to overtake passing cars, periodically driving into the oncoming lane.

All this creates potential conditions for road accidents and the death of innocent people.

Picture Credit: Pexels

The post Drinking and Driving: a Serious and Deadly Crime appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.

Donald Trump, the President of the United States, has promised that Republicans in the House of Representatives will oppose the adoption of the bill proposed by the Democrats on the police. The corresponding post was posted by the president on Twitter on Sunday.

Trump said the project, which the Democrats want to pass in the House this week, will literally destroy the police. But Republican congressmen are likely to oppose it. Also, Trump added that we must protect our police because they ensure our security.

On June 17, the Legal Committee of the US House of Representatives approved a bill proposed by Democrats aimed at large-scale police reform in response to mass protests in the country. The initiative was supported by 24 congressmen, 14 were against. Now full of The House of Representatives must vote for the document.

The main provisions of this bill will be, first of all, the ban on law enforcement agencies to use methods of stranglehold during detention, as well as the creation of a national database to track various misdemeanors of police officers. Also, the bill stipulates that in some cases it will be forbidden to issue warrants that would allow police officers to enter a house without warning.

The greatest significance of the proposed reform is to increase the responsibility of law enforcement agencies, including for disorderly and violent actions against detainees.

On June 16, Trump signed a decree on police reform. It prioritizes the allocation of federal grants for law enforcement training to encourage law enforcement to use peaceful conflict resolution practices. At the same time, the authorities will consider complaints about the use of force by the police. The innovations are designed to improve the exchange of information between government agencies, so as not to hire people to the police without a full background check.

It all came as a result of mass protests across the United States and elsewhere in the world against police violence after an African-American, George Floyd, was killed in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on May 25, when police officer kneeling on Floyd’s neck.

Picture Credit: Unsplash

The post Trump Has Promised That Republicans Will Oppose The Democrats’ Bill On Policing appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.

An innocent resident of the US state of Kansas received enormous compensation and became rich after spending 23 years in prison on a wrongful conviction.

In 1994, the 17-year-old Lamonte McIntyre was sentenced to life imprisonment for double murder, which he did not commit, and spent more than 8.5 thousand days behind bars. In October 2017, the Wyandot County Court reviewed the case and MacIntyre was rehabilitated.

The sentence review process began in 2009 at the initiative of the Kansas Attorney’s Office. During the hearing, it was established, among other things, that the prosecution put pressure on the witnesses in 1994, forcing them to give false testimonies and identify the shooter at McIntyre. Along with this, it turned out that the then detective was very likely to “declare a hunt” for African Americans on the basis of racism, and the presiding judge and prosecutor were in a romantic relationship.

The man was released in 2018. “It took me too long. This is too much for anyone to pay. I would rather just live my life. I no longer have the time to feel something like anger, ” said MacIntyre, leaving the courtroom after the acquittal.

In 2019, a 43-year-old man filed a lawsuit against the state of Kansas in accordance with the Erroneous Conviction Act, which gives illegal convicts the opportunity to receive monetary compensation.

On February 24, the office of the Attorney General decided on the case and decided to pay McIntyre $ 1.5 million. He was also granted a certificate of innocence. Case materials and DNA information will now be destroyed, and he will be able to start life from scratch.

In addition to money, the American will have full access to the health care program for two years and can rely on full tuition.

McIntyre commented on the consequences of the unlawful charge: “Kansas took 23 years of my life and gave me nothing in return. The state took my youth. “He took every birthday and Christmas with his family, and even in difficult times, when they needed me, I could not be with them.”

Once at liberty, the illegally convicted person founded the non-profit organization Miracle of Innocence, which helps those who find themselves in a similar situation.

Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt, in turn, noted that the authorities “are trying to conscientiously comply with state laws,” and the resolution of the situation with a man who spent 23 years in prison wrongly confirms this. “In the end, we were able to resolve all issues by satisfying the requirements of the law, and came to an agreement,” the agency’s press release said.

Picture Credit: Unsplash

The post A Wrongfully Convicted Man Will Receive $1.5 Million appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.

In compiling the report, a non-profit organization analyzed data on vehicle thefts received from the FBI National Crime Information Center. As a result, US cities with the highest rates of vehicle theft per capita in 2018 were identified.

The list is not the first to lead the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico, despite the fact that compared to 2016, the number of hijackings decreased by 28%.

The National Bureau of Crime Prevention explains the improvement in the fact that the Office for the Prevention of Car Theft was created in the state of New Mexico. But this success was not enough for Albuquerque not to take first place in the list of hot spots.

In these cities, cars are stolen most often:

Albuquerque, New Mexico
Anchorage, Alaska
Bakersfield, CA
Pueblo, Colorado
Modesto, California
Redding, California
Stockton-Lodi, CA
Wichita, KS
Vallejo-Fairfield, CA
St. Joseph, Missouri

The organization explains that the rating results were obtained on the basis of a population survey, therefore “an area with a much smaller population and a moderate number of hijackings often has a higher level of car theft than the area where more hijackings are statistically absorbed by a large number of residents”.

That is why St. Joseph ranks 10th with 674 car thefts, and Los Angeles – 38 with more than 53,000 hijackings.

In general, the statistics of car thefts in the United States in 2018 decreased by 3.3%, according to preliminary data from the FBI. The National Bureau of Crime Prevention notes that the number of thefts has decreased since 2004. In the period from 1991 to 2017, the number of stolen cars decreased by 53%.

The improvement is explained by the fact that “automobile manufacturers, law enforcement agencies and legislative bodies for many years reacted to crimes related to vehicle theft”.

How best to insure the car from theft

If you live in one of the states included in the list of the National Bureau of Anti-Crime, there is a high probability that you pay more for car insurance. Living in an area with a high level of hijacking can increase insurance premiums.

Fortunately, you can optimize the cost of car insurance, regardless of where you live. The best way to do this is to periodically compare your rate with those offered by other insurers. To do this, call several insurance or fill out the forms on their websites.

Picture Credit: RJA1988

The post The U.S. City Where Your Car Is Most Likely to Be Stolen appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.

Laws that Save Lives

“This bill suggests that every life has value, every life matters and deserves protection,” said Georgia’s governor Brian Kemp on May 7, signing a bill to ban abortions after 5-6 weeks of gestation.

Americans responded instantly to him, calling him “discriminatory” and “unconstitutional”. Even more outraged by the similar law in Alabama: it not only prohibits abortion in most cases, but also declares them a criminal offense. At the same time responsibility for him will not be borne by women, and doctors who will carry out the operation: they face up to 99 years imprisonment.

In the states of Arkansas, Mississippi, Kentucky and Ohio, this year has already banned abortions after the appearance of a heartbeat in the fetus. Queuing is Louisiana and South Carolina.

On May 17, a scandalous bill was signed in Missouri. Most of the Senate deputies, like in Alabama and Georgia, are Republicans.

Democrats are mostly opposed to the law: a Missourian senator, Jill Shup, has accused legislators of “not wanting to understand that all women’s lives are organized differently.”

So far, the prohibition of abortion in these states actually does not work: some have not yet come into force, while others challenge it in the courts. In North Dakota and Iowa, these laws recognized the courts as unconstitutional.
However, women who are planning – at present, still legally – to do an abortion, are already facing difficulties. For example, in Mississippi, the entire state has only one clinic where you can interrupt pregnancy.

According to a poll conducted by Morning Consult / Politico in Alabama and Georgia after the adoption of laws, 33% of people support the prohibition of abortion, while 56% oppose such an initiative.

Among the supporters of these laws is the majority of Republicans. United States President Donald Trump said that “he strongly advocates life, though he has three exceptions: rape, incest and the need to protect his mother’s life.”

However, the first two cases do not take into account the new law in Alabama. The UN Human Rights Committee emphasizes that abortions should be safe for the first time, and “as experience shows, a total ban on abortion does not reduce their number, but only drove them into an underground, thus calling into question the safety, life and health of women” .

The UN and human rights organization Human Rights Watch have declared “the discriminatory nature of such bills.”

Fighting and its results

As long as the laws have not come into action, human rights defenders can challenge them in the Supreme Court. Representatives of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) plan to go there. They believe that the adopted ban on abortion is contrary to the historic decision of the Supreme Court of 1973 – it was then that they were legalized at the federal level. It all began with the case of Roo v. Wade, when the residents of Texas succeeded in securing the recognition of an abortion law in the state unconstitutional and eventually legally abortion.

Initiators of restricting the right to abortion, mainly Republicans, have their own political motives for such decisions. For example, in Alabama 63% of state believers – Protestants, along with Catholics, they oppose the artificial abortion.

After the legalization of abortion at the state level in the 1970s, they resorted to a radical confrontation, including staging pogroms in hospitals.

Now the state authorities are coming to meet them, wanting to secure their positions in the state on the eve of the new presidential elections.

With the advent of the United States, Donald Trump of the Republican Party, known for his negative attitude to abortion, the situation has changed.

In 2016, the president said that “abortions should not be legal”, and “women who do them should be punished.” Trump also appointed two judges to the Supreme Court: in 2017 Nila Gorscha, and in 2018 Bretta Kavano. Experts suggest that, through them, Republicans can take a look at the case of “Row v. Wade.”

So that the highest judicial body in the United States reconsiders the case, four of the nine judges agree. And if that happens, it will motivate supporters of abortions throughout America.

Picture Credit: hhach

The post Alabama: Republican State Senate Passes Most Restrictive Law In Us appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.

“I remember they brought a young man who was accused of carrying a weapon. “He never had a weapon with him, your honor!” “OK let’s see”.

We went to his Facebook page and the first thing we came across was a photo of a child holding pistols and smiling widely. For the most part, everything you post online is in the public domain. If you say: “This is not my photo”, then this issue will need to be resolved in advance before the jury sees the photo. How can you prove that you are not in the photo? Or vice versa? Well, the photo was published from this account. And the account belongs to you.

Sometimes there are cases when someone publishes your photo in their own home – and you really wouldn’t want someone to see it. Suppose you have a drunk driving trial in progress. And in the photo it is very clearly visible that you were drunk, and the date coincides with the time when you were stopped on the road while drunk. And in this case, you do not have the right to indignation. You cannot appeal to the fact that you were filmed without asking.

You were in a public place. People just wanted to capture the moment. If you accidentally hit the shot while committing a crime, then everything is very bad. This photo is a clear proof of your guilt, and it is useless to deny it.

The ban on the use of illegally obtained data is used mainly in the law enforcement environment. It does not apply to a civilian. If you are stupid enough to let other people catch you at the crime scene, everything is very bad for you.

Picture Credit: Alexas_Fotos

The post Here’s How Social Media Can Be Used Against You In Court appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed a law granting patients who have been diagnosed with fatal diseases, the “right to try” experimental medicines that can prolong their life.

At the signing ceremony in the White House, Trump called this measure “fundamental freedom” for people in conditions threatening their lives. It is about the right to use drugs that have demonstrated their effectiveness in pre-testing, but not approved by regulators and not put on sale.

The bill was approved last week by the Congress after heated debates. Republicans argued that the proposed measure would re-establish hope for thousands of people trying to save their lives, whereas many democrats believe that this hope will be false.

In January, Trump expressed support for the bill in an address to the Congress about the situation in the country, saying that people suffering from fatal diseases should not leave the US for other countries in search of experimental medicines.

Patients will be able to use such drugs only if they exhaust other treatment options by taking medication approved by the regulatory authorities.

Image credit:  Pexels

The post House votes to give terminally ill patients the ‘right to try’ experimental drugs appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.

The area of ​​federal lands in California exceeds 18.5 million hectares. California Democrats fear that the tramp will allow private businesses to carry out oil prospecting or production there and want to proactively buy them out. The administration’s position boils down to the fact that federal laws take precedence over state ones and that only the Congress on the Constitution is authorized to dispose of federal lands in accordance with the interests of the state.

“California in its role,” said the head of the Justice Department Jeff Sessions. “No other state has such legislation.”

California is formally unable to block deals with federal lands, but has the right to refuse to transfer documents for ownership from one owner to another, so that the latter can not either obtain a loan secured by land or insure his plot. By law, a person registering a similar deal with the federal land without notifying the California authorities is liable to a fine of $ 5,000.

Last month, Trump administration filed a lawsuit against California for the policy of harboring illegal migrants. The President, for his part, condemned Governor Jerry Brown for pardoning the five illegal criminals who were threatened with deportation.

Picture Credit: sarangib

The post Trump administration lawsuit against California appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.

Today, 22 August, the court will issue a final verdict on Eddie Tipton, who, taking advantage of his official position, won the $ 2 million in a lottery.

He “shines” to 25 years in prison. In 2003 he began to work in one of the offices of Interstate Lottery Association (Multi-State Lottery Association), whose members include 33 US lottery operator. The association, which is a non-profit organization, monitors the choice of numbers in winning tickets, writes usa.one

The leadership of the organization trusted Eddie Tipton, and in 10 years he was appointed director of information security. But then the administration did not know that he managed to enrich himself long before his rise. In 2005, a man set on the office computer disguised as a malicious program, which “infect” all other devices involved in the determination of the winning combinations for different lotteries.

The algorithm for selecting numbers was changed, so Tipton knew in advance which tickets of which lottery operators would become prize-winning. To get the win in different states, he turned for help to his friend and businessman Robert Rhodes, as well as his own brother Tommy, a former deputy sheriff and a magistrate. The scheme has worked five times: once in Colorado in 2005 (Colorado Lottery), once in Wisconsin in 2007 (Megabucks), two in Kansas in 2010 (2by2 and Hot Lotto) and once in Oklahoma in 2011 (Hot Lotto).

The total amount that the Tipton and Rhodes brothers “won” was $ 2 million. Obtained part of the money Eddie spent on building his own country house area of ​​446 m², with a cinema and a gym. The construction was erected on an area of ​​9 hectares, near a pond. When the authorities suspected something was wrong, they began an investigation.

One of the clues was the recording from CCTV cameras in a small store in Des Moines, Iowa, where Eddy Tipton lived. The video captures the moment when, in December 2010, a man in a hood buys a winning ticket for the Hot Lotto lottery. After reviewing this video, some of Tipton’s employees and friends recognized him. Eddie was fired from work immediately after his arrest in 2015.

At the trial, he pleaded guilty. The punishment will be set tomorrow. It is assumed that he will have to “sit” for five years for each offense, that is 25 years in total. Assistant Attorney General of Iowa, Rob Sand said that such punishment will serve as a deterrent for all who think about committing such a crime. Tommy Tipton has been serving a 75-day prison term since June, and Rhodes will hear his sentence on August 25.

Eddie Raymond Tipton was sentenced to 25 years in prison.

If you need a acrimony defense advise please contact a law firm of  John P Rutkowski  to schedule a free consultation.

The post What Tipton Got For Manipulating Winning Numbers in Lottery Drawings appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.

Today, 22 August, the court will issue a final verdict on Eddie Tipton, who, taking advantage of his official position, won the $ 2 million in a lottery.

He “shines” to 25 years in prison. In 2003 he began to work in one of the offices of Multi-State Lottery Association, whose members include 33 US lottery operator. The association, which is a non-profit organization, monitors the choice of numbers in winning tickets.

The leadership of the organization trusted Eddie Tipton, and in 10 years he was appointed director of information security. But then the administration did not know that he managed to enrich himself long before his rise. In 2005, a man set on the office computer disguised as a malicious program, which “infect” all other devices involved in the determination of the winning combinations for different lotteries.

The algorithm for selecting numbers was changed, so Tipton knew in advance which tickets of which lottery operators would become prize-winning. To get the win in different states, he turned for help to his friend and businessman Robert Rhodes, as well as his own brother Tommy, a former deputy sheriff and a magistrate. The scheme has worked five times: once in Colorado in 2005 (Colorado Lottery), once in Wisconsin in 2007 (Megabucks), two in Kansas in 2010 (2by2 and Hot Lotto) and once in Oklahoma in 2011 (Hot Lotto).

The total amount that the Tipton and Rhodes brothers “won” was $ 2 million. Obtained part of the money Eddie spent on building his own country house area of ​​446 m², with a cinema and a gym. The construction was erected on an area of ​​9 hectares, near a pond. When the authorities suspected something was wrong, they began an investigation.

One of the clues was the recording from CCTV cameras in a small store in Des Moines, Iowa, where Eddy Tipton lived. The video captures the moment when, in December 2010, a man in a hood buys a winning ticket for the Hot Lotto lottery. After reviewing this video, some of Tipton’s employees and friends recognized him. Eddie was fired from work immediately after his arrest in 2015.

At the trial, he pleaded guilty. The punishment will be set tomorrow. It is assumed that he will have to “sit” for five years for each offense, that is 25 years in total. Assistant Attorney General of Iowa, Rob Sand said that such punishment will serve as a deterrent for all who think about committing such a crime. Tommy Tipton has been serving a 75-day prison term since June, and Rhodes will hear his sentence on August 25.

Picture Credit: Maklay62

The post Lottery ‘winner’ facing 25 years in prison for rigging jackpot appeared first on Criminal Lawyer Profiles.